frederickclarkson.com

The blog of Frederick Clarkson

Rally for a Theocratic Judiciary

with 4 comments

The Christian Right has always sought cast their opponents as “opponents of faith,” “anti-Christian,” “secular humanists,” and more recently, “secular fundamentalists.” But the tactic has moved to center stage in Washington politics as the battle over the federal judiciary and the Supreme Court heats up again.

The theocratic Christian Right, this time led by the Family Research Council are portraying opponents of President Bush’s judicial nominations — as well as the Supreme Court — as opponents of “people of faith” in announcing Justice Sunday II, a rally for theocratic judicial nominees to be held in a church in Nashville on August 14th. The rally, led by such veterans of the Christian Right as James Dobson, Phyllis Schlafly and Chuck Colson will be simulcast to churches and they hope on cable networks.

Tony Perkins, head of the Family Research Council and the principal organizer of the event told The New York Times that the rally will focus on “the court’s hostility toward religion and Christianity in particular.”

The nadir of the Christian Right’s rhetorical assault on the religious character of their fellow Americans was the first Justice Sunday in April. At the time fliers for the event claimed that those who oppose the Christian Right’s most extreme judicial nominations were “against people of faith.”

“As the liberal, anti-Christian dogma of the left has been repudiated in almost every recent election, the courts have become the last great bastion of liberalism,” Perkins wrote on the Family Research Council web site. “For years, he continued, “activist courts, aided by liberal interest groups like the A.C.L.U., have been quietly working under the veil of the judiciary, like thieves in the night, to rob us of our Christian heritage and our religious freedom.”

The ugly attack on the religious faith of the opponents of the theocratic right, drew outrage and sparked a mobilization in response.

The New York Times editorialized against what they called Bill Frist’s “religious war”:

“Right-wing Christian groups and the Republican politicians they bankroll have done much since the last election to impose their particular religious views on all Americans. But nothing comes close to the shameful declaration of religious war by Bill Frist, the Senate majority leader, over the selection of judges for federal courts…. Frist is determined to get judges on the federal bench who are loyal to the Republican fringe and, he hopes, would accept a theocratic test on decisions.”

Numerous editorial writers and columnists agreed.

I wrote at the time: “The Christian Right has framed it’s battles as against the supposed religion of “secular humanism,” but this was always a straw man. It was and is a war of agression being waged by a certain coalition of rightist Christians who hold to overlapping notions of Christian theocracy. They share a common cause in their desire to demolish the wall of separation between church and state, and to be able to utilize taxpayer money and public institutions and infrastructure to build their movement to a position of unassailable and permanent power in the United States.”

Once again, the theocratic Christian Right is making a big show of conflating the notion of “people of faith” with membership in he Christian Right of the Republican party. The rhetoric is a tad less strident, but the message is the same.

But the preach-fest of last time has been replaced with a more dramatic production, that will include three country music stars. Notably Lee Greenwood, the singer-songwriter best known for his patriotic hit, “God Bless the USA.” This song has been an anthem at Christian Right rallies for years, and no doubt it will be the emotional highlight of what we can expect will be a carefully choreographed program.

Like last time, religious leaders who do not share the theocratic agenda of Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) and his allies can be expected to be outraged. The first to speak out was the Rev. Dr. C. Welton Gaddy, President of The Interfaith Alliance:

“Here we go again!” Rev. Gaddy said. “And, this time the imagery and the implications of the message advanced by leaders of the religious right are more offensive, sacrilegious, and undemocratic than those so integral to Justice Sunday I.”

“Right now, the most serious threats to the fundamental rights and liberties in our nation are not coming from a lack of God’s interest but from a small group of religious right leaders who have assumed the mantle of national religious authorities and seek to impose on the whole nation and its constitution their particular views on religion, the courts, politics, and justice.”

Its my sense that the Christian Right’s power is cresting, and that with the fortunes of President Bush and the GOP plummeting in the polls, if they want to get more theocrats nominated and confirmed to the federal bench, they will have to pull out the stops. This is just the beginning.

Written by fred

July 14th, 2005 at 10:57 pm

Posted in Uncategorized


Comment Policy


Comments are welcome with a few exceptions: Comments meant to simply offend others; that are personal attacks; that are attempts at religious conversion or chastisement; or anti-religious conversion or chastisement, or other unwelcome weirdness – will either be deleted or the commenter banned from the site. I also reserve the right not to post comments from people using fake names and / or e-mail addresses. Be willing to take responsibility for your comments.


4 Responses to 'Rally for a Theocratic Judiciary'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Rally for a Theocratic Judiciary'.

  1. The theocratical battle against the rest of us would be fun to watch if it wasn’t for the fact that it’ll affect this country for so many years after it’s been rejected. Ug.

    Justice Sunday II…I mean, seriously.

    Lynne

    15 Jul 05 at 8:45 am

  2. Christians have a right to voice their opinions just as any other citizen. It is more rational to base political choices on a Christian worldview than on whatever one feels like at the moment. You are just frustrated because it is difficult to organize as a group when its individual selfishness that motivates you. You should vote for what’s best for the nation rather than “what’s in it for me”.

    Anonymous

    25 Jul 05 at 9:38 am

  3. It is more rational to base political choises on a Christian worldview than on whatever one feels like at the moment? Why? This sounds more like the individual selfishness covered up by someone who think they speak for every Christian in this country. Power in numbers is dangerous, I mean, really, we don’t have to go too far back in history to see this. Christians do have a right to voice their opinions, but so do the rest of us that choose not let a simple classification be their only justification in life; we like to call that equality. And, as for the “Christian worldview” being impied as what’s best for the nation, I really would like to hear your reasons on that too.

    Aaron Adams

    29 Jul 05 at 3:03 pm

  4. It is more rational to base political choices on a Christian worldview than on whatever one feels like at the moment? Why? This sounds more like the individual selfishness covered up by someone who think they speak for every Christian in this country. Power in numbers is dangerous, I mean, really, we don’t have to go too far back in history to see this. Christians do have a right to voice their opinions, but so do the rest of us that choose not let a simple classification be their only justification in life; we like to call that equality. And, as for the “Christian worldview” being impied as what’s best for the nation, I really would like to hear your reasons on that too.

    Aaron Adams

    29 Jul 05 at 3:04 pm

Leave a Reply